Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for a Continuous Treatment: Application to the Efficacy of Political Advertisements∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for the propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology increases the robustness to model misspecification by directly optimizing sample covariate balance between the treatment and control groups. In this paper, we extend the CBPS to a continuous treatment. We propose the covariate balancing generalized propensity score (CBGPS) methodology, which minimizes the association between covariates and the treatment. We develop both parametric and nonparametric approaches and show their superior performance over the standard maximum likelihood estimation in a simulation study. The CBGPS methodology is applied to an observational study, whose goal is to estimate the causal effects of political advertisements on campaign contributions. We also provide open-source software that implements the proposed methods.
منابع مشابه
High Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing
In this paper, we address the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) and the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT) in observational studies when the number of potential confounders is possibly much greater than the sample size. In particular, we develop a robust method to estimate the propensity score via covariate balancing in high-dimensional settings. Since it is u...
متن کاملCovariate balancing propensity score
The propensity score plays a central role in a variety of causal inference settings. In particular, matching and weighting methods based on the estimated propensity score have become increasingly common in the analysis of observational data. Despite their popularity and theoretical appeal, the main practical difficulty of these methods is that the propensity score must be estimated. Researchers...
متن کاملCovariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes
Propensity score matching and inverse-probability weighting are popular methods for causal inference in observational studies. Under the assumption of unconfoundedness, these methods enable researchers to estimate causal effects by balancing observed covariates across different treatment values. While their extensions to general treatment regimes exist, a vast majority of applications have been...
متن کاملParametric and Nonparametric Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes∗
Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology weakens this assumption by directly optimizing sample covariate b...
متن کاملImproving Covariate Balancing Propensity Score: A Doubly Robust and Efficient Approach
Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a popular method for estimating causal effects in many disciplines. However, empirical studies show that the IPTW estimators can be sensitive to the misspecification of propensity score model. To address this problem, several researchers have proposed new methods to estimate propensity score by directly optimizing the balance of pre-treatment...
متن کامل